Simplified Tax Regime for Entrepreneurs and Small Businesses (RIMPE): A Tax Contribution for Microenterprises
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The microenterprises in Quevedo canton, the implementation of the Simplified Regime for Entrepreneurs and Popular Businesses (RIMPE) has sought to facilitate formalization and reduce administrative burdens, although little evidence remains regarding its real economic impact. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of this regime on the economic variables of microenterprises during 2023. A quantitative methodology was applied, with a non experimental design and descriptive scope, using surveys of a representative sample of 157 economic units. The results show a high level of formalization and administrative simplification, but also limitations in knowledge of the regime and heterogeneous effects on profitability, with an increased tax burden perceived in many cases. The discussion suggests that these findings are related to a weak tax culture and structural limitations in the sector, which reduces the effectiveness of the regime as a public policy. It is concluded that, although the regime contributes to tax order, its impact on business growth and sustainability is limited, requiring strengthening through training and technical support to maximize its benefits.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Barberan, N., Santillan, R., Bastidas, T., & Peña, M. (2022). Comportamiento tributario de microempresas en Ecuador. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(98), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.98.18
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2005). SMEs, growth, and poverty: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-005-3533-5
Bruhn, M., & McKenzie, D. (2014). Entry regulation and the formalization of microenterprises in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 29(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lku002
Chimba-Jimenez, N. D., Benavides-Pinargote, R. L., Palate-Mayorga, M. A., Chimba-Padilla, J. C., & Zamora-Mayorga, D. J. (2025). El impacto de la política fiscal en los programas sociales del MIES de Quevedo. Revista Científica Ciencia Y Método, 3(3), 322-334. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/rcym/v3/n3/76
Coello-Zavala, N. J., & Concha-Ramírez, J. A. (2025). Análisis de la incidencia de la IA aplicada en el asesoramiento financiero y tributario de 2020-2024 . Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 5(1), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v5/n1/175
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill.
Joshi, A., Prichard, W., & Heady, C. (2014). Taxing the informal economy: The current state of knowledge and agendas for future research. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(10), 1325–1347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.940910
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento (4.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
La Porta, R., & Shleifer, A. (2014). Informality and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.109
Montenegro-Pérez, A. S., Ruiz-Cortez, S. L., Verdezoto-Águila, P. M., Romero-Mera, W. W., & Padilla-Romero, F. A. (2024). Análisis del cumplimiento de obligaciones del Impuesto a la Renta, en las PYMES de Urdaneta. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 4(4), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v4/n4/145
OECD. (2021). Tax Policy Reforms 2021: Special Edition on Tax Policy during the COVID-19 Pandemic. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/427d2616-en
Perry, G. E., Maloney, W. F., Arias, O. S., Fajnzylber, P., Mason, A. D., & Saavedra-Chanduvi, J. (2007). Informality: Exit and exclusion. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7092-6
Pilay-Asunción, D. D., & Marcos-Rodriguez, K. L. (2025). Los desafíos tecnológicos y el rol del contador en la automatización de procesos contables. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 5(1), 306–329. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v5/n1/178
Rodríguez-Pacheco, F. J., Carriel-Palma, R. J., Romero-Alvarez, K. B., & Concha-Ramírez, J. A. (2025). NIIF 15 y su interacción con la legislación tributaria Ecuatoriana desafíos en la aplicación empresarial. Revista Científica Ciencia Y Método, 3(3), 400-415. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/rcym/v3/n3/83
Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.1.77
Villalta-Santana, V. E., & Monroy-Baquerizo, C. A. (2025). Impacto de las reformas fiscales recientes en las pequeñas y medianas empresas. Revista Científica Zambos, 4(1), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.69484/rcz/v4/n1/90
Villón-Ramirez, A. B., & Estefano-Almeida, M. A. (2025). Evaluación de las reformas tributarias y su influencia en la recaudación del impuesto a la renta en Ecuador durante los periodos 2022-2024. Revista Científica Zambos, 4(1), 328-344. https://doi.org/10.69484/rcz/v4/n1/93
World Bank. (2020). Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1440-2
Zambrano-Plua, N. D., Arias-Perez, M. G., & Salazar-Mejía, C. A. (2024). Regímenes Tributarios en Latinoamérica y Estrategias Efectivas para Mitigar la Evasión Fiscal. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 4(4), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v4/n4/137