Prosecutorial Performance and Principles of Legality, Objectivity, and Functional Independence in Criminal Prosecutor’s Offices of Lima, Peru
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research problem focused on determining the level of prosecutorial performance regarding the principles of legality, objectivity, direction of investigation, and functional independence within the Criminal Prosecutor’s Offices of the Judicial District of Lima, Peru. The objective was to analyze these dimensions within criminal proceedings. Methodologically, the study adopted a quantitative approach, with a descriptive level and a non-experimental cross-sectional design, applying a questionnaire to 52 prosecutors. The results revealed a predominance of a medium level in prosecutorial performance and its dimensions, particularly in legality, objectivity, and functional independence. The discussion showed that, although prosecutorial performance was functionally acceptable, significant limitations still persist that could affect objectivity and independence, especially in contexts of media pressure and high public exposure. The study concluded that prosecutorial performance develops in a moderately adequate manner; however, it is necessary to strengthen principles related to legality, objectivity, and functional independence to ensure actions compatible with due process and the protection of fundamental rights.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abadi, Y. B., Thahir, A., & Fitri, T. A. (2024). The impact of viral content on public policy: A systematic literature review on institutional responses to online public aspirations. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah dan Pariwisata Halal, 3(2), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.70371/jseht.v3i2.234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70371/jseht.v3i2.234
Bysaha, Yu. M. (2022). Independence as a key principle of prosecution activities: General principles of implementation. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 74(2), 196–198. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.74.67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.74.67
Calle Arias, X. V. (2022). El principio de objetividad fiscal en la etapa pre-procesal. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 5(S1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.62452/7830zk35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62452/7830zk35
Carranza-Ugarte, L., Díaz-Saavedra, J., & Galdón-Sánchez, J. E. (2023). Rethinking fiscal rules. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(3), 833–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.02.005
Ciscato, E. S., Losso, E. B., Munhoz, I. S., & Kirsten, L. M. A. (2024). Condenados pela mídia: Influência e perspectivas de responsabilização civil dos meios de comunicação pela “pré-condenação” em casos criminais de grande repercussão. Aracê, 6(3), 6919–6942. https://doi.org/10.56238/arev6n3-156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/arev6n3-156
Cruz Trejo, M. G. (2025). Implicancia del abuso de derecho del control político legislativo a la independencia del Ministerio Público en la dirección de la investigación preliminar. Lucerna Iuris et Investigatio, (8), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.15381/lucerna.n8.30724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/lucerna.n8.30724
Garrido Lorenzo, M. Á. (2024). Principios de actuación del Ministerio Fiscal, a la luz del Código Ético. Revista del Ministerio Fiscal, (14), 72–92. https://www.fiscal.es/documents/d/fiscal/revista-del-ministerio-fiscal-ano-2024-numero-14
LP Pasión por el Derecho. (2026a, 12 de febrero). Código Procesal Penal peruano [actualizado 2026]. Recuperado el 8 de junio de 2026, de https://lpderecho.pe/nuevo-codigo-procesal-penal-peruano-actualizado/
LP Pasión por el Derecho. (2026b, 19 de febrero). Constitución Política del Perú [actualizada 2026]. Recuperado el 8 de junio de 2026, de https://lpderecho.pe/constitucion-politica-peru-actualizada/
Ministerio Público Fiscalía de la Nación. (2024, 14 de enero). ¿Qué es el Ministerio Público-Fiscalía de la Nación? Plataforma del Estado Peruano. https://www.gob.pe/23554
Moreno-Sacón, V. C., & García-Segarra, H. G. (2025). Independencia judicial en Ecuador y los desafíos frente al control del Consejo de la Judicatura. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 5(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v5/n2/192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v5/n2/192
Núñez-Ribadeneyra, R. A. (2023). Derechos Humanos y Justicia Social en el Contexto Ecuatoriano. Revista Científica Zambos, 2(3), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.69484/rcz/v2/n3/49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69484/rcz/v2/n3/49
Parco Mesia, E. E. (2024). La infracción constitucional de la imparcialidad judicial en el proceso por delito de ejercicio privado de la acción penal. Alpha Centauri, 5(4), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.47422/ac.v5i4.186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47422/ac.v5i4.186
Ried Undurraga, I. (2025). Aspectos procesales del sobreseimiento definitivo por inexistencia del delito y falta de participación del imputado: Revisión crítica de las facultades del tribunal y del estándar jurisprudencial para apreciarlo. Pro Jure Revista de Derecho - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, (64), 391–426. https://doi.org/10.4151/SO2810-76592025064-1431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4151/SO2810-76592025064-1431
Rodríguez Bahamonde, R. (2022). Presunción de inocencia, juicios previos y juicios paralelos. Revista Internacional Consinter de Direito, 8(14), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00014.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00014.14