PhET for Virtual Laboratories and Augmented Reality in Science Education for Upper Elementary Students at Tnte. Maximiliano Rodríguez L School

Main Article Content

Cesar Augusto Manzanillas-Jumbo
Christian Fernando Villalva-Sánchez
Washington Fernando Maliza-Muñoz
Liceth Anabell Mendoza-Nevárez

Abstract

Science teaching in upper elementary education is still largely based on traditional instructional methods that restrict experimentation and hinder students' understanding of scientific phenomena. In response to this problem, the aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential of virtual laboratories based on PhET simulations and augmented reality activities as a teaching strategy to strengthen science learning. A mixed-methods study with a descriptive-explanatory scope and a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was conducted with 96 students. Data were complemented through interviews, classroom observation, and analysis using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. The findings revealed a substantial improvement in academic performance (pretest: M = 13.85; posttest: M = 17.03), statistically significant differences (Z = −8.545; p < .001), and a large effect size (d = 1.21). These results are consistent with previous studies reporting that virtual laboratories promote active, meaningful, and inquiry-based learning in science education. It is concluded that integrating PhET simulations with augmented reality activities represents an effective teaching strategy for improving science learning and fostering students' scientific competencies in upper elementary education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Manzanillas-Jumbo, C. A., Villalva-Sánchez, C. F., Maliza-Muñoz, W. F., & Mendoza-Nevárez, L. A. (2026). PhET for Virtual Laboratories and Augmented Reality in Science Education for Upper Elementary Students at Tnte. Maximiliano Rodríguez L School. Scientific Journal Science and Method, 4(3), 488-504. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/rcym/v4/n3/249

References

Almasri, F. (2022). Simulations to teach science subjects: Connections among students’ engagement, self-confidence, satisfaction, and learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7161–7181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10940-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10940-w

Asamblea Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador (Registro Oficial No. 449). https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/02/Constitucion-de-la-Republica-del-Ecuador_act_ene-2021.pdf

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2021). Ley Orgánica Reformatoria de la Ley Orgánica de Educación Intercultural (Suplemento del Registro Oficial No. 434, 19 de abril de 2021). https://www.asambleanacional.gob.ec/es/system/files/ro-sup-434-19-04-2021.pdf

Ben Ouahi, M., Ait Hou, M., Bliya, A., Hassouni, T., & Al Ibrahmi, E. M. (2021). The effect of using computer simulation on students’ performance in teaching and learning physics: Are there any gender and area gaps? Education Research International, 2021, Artículo 6646017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6646017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6646017

Ben Ouahi, M., Lamri, D., Hassouni, T., & Al Ibrahmi, E. M. (2022). Science teachers’ views on the use and effectiveness of interactive simulations in science teaching and learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15116a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15116a

Chinaka, T. W. (2021). The effect of PhET simulation vs. phenomenon-based experiential learning on students’ integration of motion along two independent axes in projectile motion. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2021.1969739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2021.1969739

Diab, H., Daher, W., Rayan, B., Issa, N., & Rayan, A. (2024). Transforming science education in elementary schools: The power of PhET simulations in enhancing student learning. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(11), Artículo 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8110105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8110105

Erazo-Luzuriaga, A. F. (2024). Integración de las TICs en el aula: Un análisis de su impacto en el rendimiento académico. Revista Científica Zambos, 3(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.69484/rcz/v3/n1/12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69484/rcz/v3/n1/12

Fuentes-Rendón, M. K., Cervantes-García, V. A., Macías-Véliz, J. N., & Morales-Intriago, F. L. (2025). Innovación metodológica en el aula: Estrategias activas para promover aprendizajes significativos en la educación básica. Revista Científica Ciencia Y Método, 3(3), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/rcym/v3/n3/65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/rcym/v3/n3/65

Guerra-Guerra, M. Á. (2026). Pragmatismo y epistemología postpositivista como base para investigaciones doctorales en mejora mediante inteligencia artificial aplicada. Revista Ciencia & Sociedad, 6(2), 254–265. https://cienciaysociedaduatf.com/index.php/ciesocieuatf/article/view/51

Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza Torres, C. P. (2020). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education. https://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://www.biblioteca.cij.gob.mx/Archivos/Materiales_de_consulta/Drogas_de_Abuso/Articulos/SampieriLasRutas.pdf

Kaldaras, L., Wang, K. D., Nardo, J. E., Price, A., Perkins, K., Wieman, C., & Salehi, S. (2024). Employing technology-enhanced feedback and scaffolding to support the development of deep science understanding using computer simulations. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Artículo 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00490-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00490-7

Lafita Frómeta, R., & López Barrero, Y. (2026). Recursos virtuales en la enseñanza de las ciencias naturales: experiencias innovadoras desde Ecuador. En M. L. Cáceres-Mesa (Comp.), Educación superior en tiempos de inteligencia artificial: pedagogía, evaluación y bienestar (pp. 106–154). Sophia Editions. https://doi.org/10.64092/HBRD5095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64092/HBRD5095

Mejía Cavadia, J. F. (2022). PhET estrategia didáctica para mejorar el proceso de aprendizaje de las ciencias naturales en estudiantes de octavo grado [Tesis de maestría, Universidad de Santander]. Repositorio Institucional UDES. https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/handle/001/8475

Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2016). Currículo de los niveles de educación obligatoria: subnivel superior. https://educacion.gob.ec/curriculo-superior/

Montañez León, L. C. (2023). Uso del simulador PhET como objeto virtual de aprendizaje para la formación en el pensamiento bioético en el área de química de grado octavo [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador]. Espacio Digital UPEL. https://espacio.digital.upel.edu.ve/index.php/TGM/article/view/630

Penfield, R. D., & Giacobbi, P. R., Jr. (2004). Applying a score confidence interval to Aiken’s item content-relevance index. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327841MPEE0804_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0804_3

PhET Interactive Simulations. (2024). PhET interactive simulations. University of Colorado Boulder. Recuperado el 24 de agosto de 2026, de https://phet.colorado.edu/

Ponce Intriago, D. I., & Navarrete Pita, Y. (2025). Resultados del uso del software PhET en la asignatura de química orgánica en los estudiantes de tercero de bachillerato. Estudios del Desarrollo Social: Cuba y América Latina, 13(2), 246–268.

Silva Alvarado, J. C., & Herrera Navas, C. D. (2022). Estudio de Kahoot como recurso didáctico para innovar los procesos evaluativos pospandemia de básica superior de la Unidad Educativa Iberoamericano. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 2(4), 15–40. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v2/n4/23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v2/n4/23

Trujillo Yaipén, W. M., Curo Maquén, L. A., Paredes López, L. R., & Carbajal Cornejo, K. (2023). Eficiencia de los simuladores virtuales en la competencia de indagación para el aprendizaje de física elemental. Telos: Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 25(2), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.36390/telos252.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36390/telos252.15

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501