The relationship between ergonomic conditions, well-being at work and productivity among workers in the business sector
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Ergonomics constitutes a strategic component of human resource management because it allows working conditions to be adapted to the physical, cognitive, and organizational capacities of employees, promoting their well-being and performance. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between ergonomic conditions, workplace well-being, and productivity among employees of TABAPAEZ, located in Quevedo, Ecuador. The research followed a quantitative approach, with a non-experimental, cross-sectional, and correlational design, applied to a census sample of 44 employees. Data were collected through a structured Likert-scale questionnaire, complemented by interviews and direct observation. The results showed that the implementation of ergonomic principles is at a medium-low level, with basic practices predominating and limited integration into comprehensive management processes. Likewise, ergonomic conditions were found to have a positive influence on employee well-being, although this effect was not uniform among all workers. A moderate positive correlation was identified between ergonomics and workplace well-being, as well as between ergonomics and productivity. In conclusion, strengthening ergonomic management can improve employee well-being and organizational performance.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Carayon, P., Schoofs Hundt, A., Karsh, B.-T., Gurses, A. P., Alvarado, C. J., Smith, M., & Brennan, P. F. (2006). Work system design for patient safety: The SEIPS model. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(Suppl. 1), i50–i58. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.015842
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, K. G., & Kotowski, S. E. (2014). Postural variability: An effective way to reduce musculoskeletal discomfort in office work. Human Factors, 56(7), 1249–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814528003
Dul, J., & Neumann, W. P. (2009). Ergonomics contributions to company strategies. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.001
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications
García-Herrero, S., Mariscal, M. A., Gutiérrez, J. M., & Ritzel, D. O. (2013). Using Bayesian networks to analyze occupational stress caused by work demands: Preventing stress through social support. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 57, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.009
Hoe, V. C. W., Urquhart, D. M., Kelsall, H. L., Zamri, E. N., & Sim, M. R. (2018). Ergonomic interventions for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck among office workers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(10), Article CD008570. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008570.pub3
Hoffmann-Jaramillo, K., Flores-Murillo, C. R., Vallejo-López, A. B., Chang-Camacho, L., & Martínez-Bayas, M. E. (2024). La huella ergonómica una visión integradora entre la productividad y la salud. Editorial Grupo AEA. https://doi.org/10.55813/egaea.l.97
International Labour Organization. (2019). Safety and health at the heart of the future of work: Building on 100 years of experience. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@safework/documents/publication/wcms_687610.pdf
Karsh, B.-T., Waterson, P., & Holden, R. J. (2014). Crossing levels in systems ergonomics: A framework to support “mesoergonomic” inquiry. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.021
Puyol-Cortez, J. L. (2021). La satisfacción laboral como factor clave para la productividad en las PYMES de Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 1(2), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v1/n2/31
Quiñonez-Cabeza, B. M., Custode-Quiñonez, J., Bedoya-Flores, M. C., & Salgado-Ortiz, P. J. (2025). Neuromanagement y su influencia en la productividad organizacional. Revista Científica Ciencia Y Método, 3(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/rcym/v3/n1/35
Robertson, M. M., Ciriello, V. M., & Garabet, A. M. (2013). Office ergonomics training and a sit-stand workstation: Effects on musculoskeletal and visual symptoms and performance of office workers. Applied Ergonomics, 44(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.001
Robertson, M. M., Huang, Y. H., & Lee, J. (2017). Improvements in musculoskeletal health and computing behaviors: Effects of a macroergonomics office workplace and training intervention. Applied Ergonomics, 62, 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.017
Wilson, J. R. (2014). Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.021
World Health Organization. (2010). Healthy workplaces: A model for action: For employers, workers, policy-makers and practitioners. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241599313
Yaulilahua-Huacho, R., & Almenaba-Guerrero, Y. F. . (2022). Liderazgo y Cultura Organizacional: Influencias en la Productividad en Ecuador. Revista Científica Zambos, 1(3), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.69484/rcz/v1/n3/31
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.